I think some people just have very specific ideas about personalities and the way people interact and they feel that sexual positions correlate to those images.
That depends. If you feel strongly about the correlation between sexual positions and personality, then the fic won't be good for you because the characters will seem OOC.
It matters to me only if the sex was the main focus of the story, and like lunardreamed said above - the fic won't be good for you because the characters will seem OOC, and since the sex is the story, then who tops and who bottoms does matter IMHO.
But if the sex is not the main focus, like in a Wincesty case-fic, than it doesn't really matter.
SUPERNATURAL of course! (unless doubling up with something that's already been requested isn't allowed, in which case I can probably be pressed to choose something else ^_^)
And re who tops in fic... I honestly couldn't tell you why it matters, but I only only ONLY ever write Sam topping. There are probably all kinds of fun meta analytical reason I could suss out for it, but I'm not really good with that sort of thing. I'll readily read both, though even reading Sam/Dean I have a preference for bottom!Dean and top!Sam. DO NOT KNOW! *flail*
I mean CLEARLY the rule is that whoever is TALLER has to TOP, DUH. It is the rule of yaoi!
I would love to see an SPN version of Hans Christian Andersen's The Nightingale.
As for who tops . . . I think I agree with other commenters who have mentioned that the question of who tops is predicated upon our personal interpretation of the characters. The "wrong" person topping seems OOC.
:laughsoutloud: I totally enjoyed the concept of this and then clicked on the pic after reading and squealed. That's adorable! Now I'm all curious about Sam's other shifts and what happened when he did. How inspired are you?
I was imagining Max's flashbacks while reading this, and could really feel your Ben connecting with how they portrayed him and the others. Wonderful job! :D
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 01:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 01:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 02:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 02:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 02:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 02:13 am (UTC)But if the sex is not the main focus, like in a Wincesty case-fic, than it doesn't really matter.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 02:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 03:58 am (UTC)And re who tops in fic... I honestly couldn't tell you why it matters, but I only only ONLY ever write Sam topping. There are probably all kinds of fun meta analytical reason I could suss out for it, but I'm not really good with that sort of thing. I'll readily read both, though even reading Sam/Dean I have a preference for bottom!Dean and top!Sam. DO NOT KNOW! *flail*
I mean CLEARLY the rule is that whoever is TALLER has to TOP, DUH. It is the rule of yaoi!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 04:10 am (UTC)I figured size had something to do with it. But what about wee!cest?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 08:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 01:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 03:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-17 03:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 03:39 pm (UTC)As for who tops . . . I think I agree with other commenters who have mentioned that the question of who tops is predicated upon our personal interpretation of the characters. The "wrong" person topping seems OOC.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 08:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-27 03:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-11 04:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-18 04:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-21 01:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-21 01:38 pm (UTC)Thank you for reading!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-21 04:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-21 04:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-27 05:52 am (UTC)I was imagining Max's flashbacks while reading this, and could really feel your Ben connecting with how they portrayed him and the others. Wonderful job! :D
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-27 05:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-27 01:46 pm (UTC)