query

Nov. 16th, 2009 03:14 pm
tigriswolf: (Default)
[personal profile] tigriswolf
Is monumentous not a word? I swear it is, but spellcheck and dictionary.com don't agree with me.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sneaky-sena.livejournal.com
It's not a word. You're probably looking for either momentous or monumental.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 09:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sneaky-sena.livejournal.com
It would be, "That is a truly momentous occasion."

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 11:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lunardreamed.livejournal.com
Yeah, I gotta agree with this. When I just saw the word, I thought that it was, but when you put it in the sentence . . . I've never seen it written with that word. I've only ever seen "That is truly a momentous occasion."

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamlittleyo.livejournal.com
My instinct says yes. My dictionary ALSO says no. It's a conundrum.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 09:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamlittleyo.livejournal.com
aaand, now that I've seen [livejournal.com profile] sneaky_sena's comment I'm going "oh, right!" and realizing I totally spliced those two words together. Momentous and monumental. I can see why those wanted to become one word together in my head.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 09:24 pm (UTC)
ext_19743: (House Rules chorus)
From: [identity profile] billysgirl5.livejournal.com
I thought it was a word, but after seeing this post, I had to check it out myself. According to WikiAnswers, it's not an actual word. It's a portmanteau (a blend of two (or more) words or morphemes and their meanings into one new word). Although, Urban Dictionary lists it as a word.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 09:27 pm (UTC)
caffienekitty: (What the...)
From: [personal profile] caffienekitty
Apparently not, which is all kinds of wrong. I've heard it used on several occasions in the media. OED and Webster's should have picked it up by now on usage alone.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 09:41 pm (UTC)
caffienekitty: (smirk)
From: [personal profile] caffienekitty
Yep, acceptance through usage is an awesome thing.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-17 06:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greyandgold.livejournal.com
Strangely, I'm more comfortable with awesomsauce than monumentous.

Coolness ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 09:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sneaky-sena.livejournal.com
Eh. You could make the same argument about irregardless, which is also not a word.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 09:45 pm (UTC)
caffienekitty: (ponder)
From: [personal profile] caffienekitty
"Monumentous" is a portmanteau, though, and has cool additional connotations that enrich the language. "Irregardless" is just... sort of redundant and wrong-sounding. But who knows, in time it might be acceptable too. I remember when 'ain't' was added to the Dictionary, so anything is possible.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 10:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charis-kalos.livejournal.com
Ain't is in the dictionary? When did that happen? It's a word that sets my teeth on edge. Like 'yous' as the plural of you. (And please tell me that 'yous' isn't in the dictionary. Please!)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 11:02 pm (UTC)
caffienekitty: Dean sitting slumped in a chair. "Will kill for coffee" (Default)
From: [personal profile] caffienekitty
Ain't. It went in there sometime around the eighties, iirc. There was a minor kerfuffle about it.

Yous appears to be in some, but I don't know if it's made it to Merriam-Webster yet.

I think there's been more of a push to include words in use rather than strictly correct words, for the sake of second language learners looking things up but not being able to find them. That's sheer conjecture on my part though.

The one that got me was the addition of d'oh, Homer Simpson's catch-phrase, to the Oxford Dictionary in 1998.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 11:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charis-kalos.livejournal.com
Although widely disapproved as nonstandard and more common in the habitual speech of the less educated, ain't in senses 1 and 2 is flourishing in American English

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Must check the Macquarie and see what it's doing in Australian English.

*returns to work depressed at the state of the world*

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-17 04:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charis-kalos.livejournal.com
I studied with a Texan when I was in Switzerland and she said "y'all" or "yawl" or "ya'll" (how do you spell that?) and it was adorable. But I don't think she said "ain't". I'm sure I would have run screaming from the room if she had.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-17 04:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charis-kalos.livejournal.com
I generally use ain't just to prove a point or be annoying.

And with me that would totally work.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-16 10:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gestalt1.livejournal.com
I'm pretty sure it is. Maybe it's actually a reasonably new word or something, but I'm pretty sure enough people use it that it qualifies for a word.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-17 12:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oc-pixie.livejournal.com
I think you're combining momentous and monumental...but hey! New Word!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-17 02:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alleysweeper.livejournal.com
To Hell with the dictionary. WE know it's a word. (Although, I wouldn't want to test that theory on your professor)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-17 03:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alleysweeper.livejournal.com
Why, you little rebel! Hee!

Profile

tigriswolf: (Default)
tigriswolf

September 2021

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags